CAPA in pharma

Rahul Kashyap
0

Purpose
To lay down the procedure for assigning, tracking, closure and effectiveness   monitoring of CAPA to ensure appropriate actions are taken in order to avoid recurrence of issues and to minimize the risks associated with it             
          Approval of CAPA.
          To review implemented CAPA for its effectiveness.
          Tracking and closure of CAPA.
          Trending of CAPA.
          Implementation and Compliance with SOP.
          Approval of SOP.
          To revised the SOP as when required.
Procedure:
Definition
Correction: Action to eliminate a detected nonconformity. A correction can be made in conjunction with a corrective action.
Corrective Action: Action taken to eliminate the cause of a non conformance that has occurred, and   prevent   re occurrence   of   the   non conformance.    (In   this   case   a non conformance has already occurred).
Preventive Action: Action taken to eliminate the cause of a potential non conformance and prevent the non conformance from occurring.  (In this case a non conformance has not yet occurred).
CAPA is a fundamental tool that shall be used in every quality system. CAPA consist of seven steps as follows:
Identification- The initial step begins with clearly defining the potential or actual problem, nonconformity or incident, and describing the situation as it currently exists, and shall be reported and documented accurately.
Evaluation- The identified problem should be evaluated to determine the need for action. The potential impact of the problem and the actual risks to the product quality, safety, process, and equipment and/or customers must be determined and documented.
Investigation- Investigation shall depend on the circumstances, must incorporate a comprehensive review and analysis of all of the circumstances related to the identified problem.
Analysis- Analysis is to determine the root cause of the problem described, investigating all possible causes to determine the root cause of the identified problem. Appropriate tools shall be used to identify the root cause such as FMEA, Ishikawa diagram, Brain storming, 5 Why and FMECA.
Action Plan- The plan should include, the items to be completed, document changes, any process, procedure, or system changes required, employee training, and any monitors or controls necessary to prevent the problem or a recurrence of the problem. The action plan shall also identify the person or persons responsible for completing each task.
Implementation- All of the required tasks listed and described in the action plan shall be initiated, completed and documented.
Effectiveness check / Follow Up- The implementation and completion of the listed action plan must be verified and recorded. Appropriate information shall be documented that all actions have been completed successfully.
Corrective Action and Preventive Action shall be documented and implemented for non-conformities discovered from following sources but not limited to;
          Product complaints
          Deviations
          Lab incidents
          Process validation, performance and variations
          Customer Query Response
          Annual Product Quality Review / Trend Data
          External Audits and Internal Audits
          Out of specification
          Out of trend
          Stability Failures (Significant changes)
          Failure Investigation Reports
          Utility / Equipment failures
All the above listed sources of CAPA shall be appropriately evaluated & investigated to determine the root cause.
Based on the root cause identified the concerned department Head/Designee shall initiate for CAPA and send request for CAPA Form to QA.
QA shall record the details in the “CAPA Logbook”.
Concerned department Head/Designee shall list all the actions required for correction / prevention (if applicable) of the identified problem “CAPA Form” & forward it to QA for their review.
QA Head/Designee shall review the CAPA form for correctness & completeness and approve / reject the proposed CAPA.
Responsible persons and target completion date shall be assigned based on the agreement of the department which are involved in the implementation of CAPA.
All the action plan listed in the CAPA form shall be implemented within due date and with appropriate documentation.
If any document / equipment / facility has to be modified / change as per action plan shall be routed through the SOP for “Change Control”,
Concerned department Head/Designee involved in implementation of CAPA shall record the implementation details of the implemented CAPA.
QA Head or Designee shall verify implemented CAPA for its correctness and completeness.
Effectiveness check
QA Head or Designee shall review the need of effectiveness check & provide the details.
In case effectiveness check is not required than the CAPA shall be closed by QA Head or Designee after verifying the implemented CAPA.
QA Head or designee shall assign owner to perform the effectiveness   check of the implemented action along with duration to perform the Effectiveness Check.
Effectiveness check owner shall verify the effectiveness of implemented CAPA for following (but not limited to);
          Expected results are obtained.
          Effect on the other system / product / equipment.
          Occurrence of the similar problem after implementation of CAPA.
After completion of the effectiveness check of implemented action Effectiveness check owner shall enter the details of effectiveness check and forward to QA Head.
QA Head/Designee shall review the effectiveness of the implemented CAPA.
Based on the review Head QA or Designee shall decide whether the implemented CAPA is effective or not.
CAPA closure
In case implemented CAPA is not effective then CAPA shall be closed as not effective and new CAPA shall be initiated.  Previous CAPA shall be consider as closed and reference of previous CAPA shall be given in the new CAPA.
In case implemented CAPA is effective then CAPA shall be closed as CAPA effective.
In case CAPA is not implemented within the proposed due date, concerned department Head/Designee shall give the justification for delay and propose the tentative date for closure as per Format “Justification Form for Delay in Closure of CAPA”,
QA Head or Designee shall review the justification and extend the due date up to 2 months, and maximum 3 extensions shall be allowed.
Concern Department shall implement the CAPA with in extended completion date and record the details in CAPA.
Trending of CAPA:
CAPA shall be reviewed on quarterly basis for indication of specific or recurring issue requiring attention short term or long term additional Corrective and Preventive action.
CAPA trend and graphical representation shall be used to present the data.
CAPA trend & re occurrence issues are to be discussed in the management review meeting.
All the product specific CAPA recommendation shall be reviewed during the annual product quality review.
Based on the review, if required further corrective action / preventive action shall be taken for specific or reoccurring problems.



Post a Comment

0Comments
Post a Comment (0)